【活力中国】兔年春节将至，哪些年货最抢手？******
中新网1月20日电(中新财经 左雨晴) “广西的朋友能不能再摘快一点，不够吃！”“别催了，剪子都冒火星了！”春节前夕，从网友喊话砂糖橘，到“车厘子打败砂糖橘成最热年货”登上热搜，年货再度成为人们热议的话题。
那么，今年人们置办的年货又有哪些新花样？
兔元素受追捧 转运珠销售火爆
辞“虎”迎“兔”，农历癸卯兔年即将到来。春节前夕，兔元素年货走俏市场。
京东数据显示，去年12月底以来，与“兔年”相关产品同比增长了30倍，其中服饰内衣销量占比超过6成。
早在去年12月底，各种兔元素的玩偶、春联、饰品就已经占领了各大商场，早早烘托出年味儿。除“氛围组”外，不少商家也加入了兔年营销大战。茅台、五粮液、泸州老窖、古井贡酒等多家白酒企业推出了兔年生肖酒，雅诗兰黛、欧莱雅等知名化妆品品牌也推出了兔年限定礼盒。
北京菜百首饰总店转运珠柜台前购买的人群。 左雨晴 摄兔元素也席卷了黄金市场。岁末添金是不少人过年图个“好彩头”的方式，今年兔元素的转运珠尤为热销。中新财经注意到，不少商场的金店，转运珠专柜前挤满了前来购买的消费者。
在北京菜百首饰总店，转运珠柜台前人头攒动，最外围的顾客踮脚探头也难以窥见柜台上的展品。现场不得不临时建起购物通道，引导消费者有序购买交款。“没想到买个配转运珠的编织绳也要排队。”一位带着孩子的母亲表示，她为孩子选购了一款兔子样式的转运珠。
礼盒再度热销 老字号门前排起长队
随着新冠疫情防控政策的优化调整，今年春节前后迎来春运返乡高峰。人们在返乡前为亲朋好友购买当地特产，老字号成为不少人送礼的首选。
返乡前一天早上8点，小岑(化名)来到北京稻香村零号店，在寒风中排了近2个小时后，她终于买到了稻香村兔年限定的九宫格礼盒。“明天就要回家了，想要带点特产给家里人尝尝。”她向中新财经表示，自己排队的时间还算是短的，听说有人从早上排到了下午。
排队买年货的顾客。左雨晴 摄中新财经在走访中发现，来稻香村零号店买礼盒的，大多是春节返乡的外地人，这也催生了“代买黄牛”。该店门口不得不贴出了限购标识，网上也有网友开始分享排队攻略。除零号店外，稻香村其余的多家店面也排起长队。一名消费者表示，即使是购买散装，也要排队近一个小时。
有网友对此调侃：“凌晨5点半就来排队，这送的哪是稻香村，送的是我满满的心意啊。”
此外，百年义利、张一元、吴裕泰等老字号产品同样迎来热销。
老字号在线上也受到欢迎。京东数据显示，近期，7成北方人首选老字号商品作为年礼，“老字号”关键词搜索上升120%。其中，00后、90后买走了半数的老字号商品礼盒。而北京稻香村京八件礼盒成为南方最爱的北方味，销量同比增长超65%。
保健品走俏 食补成年夜饭新趋势
疫情防控进入新阶段后的第一个春节，“健康”成为不少人置办年货的关键词。
一名药店销售人员告诉中新财经，近期店内保健品热销。“比较受欢迎的是维C、蛋白粉和氨糖软骨素钙片。”她表示，前来购买的顾客大多数是年轻人。“基本都是买回去送给老人的。”
而在年夜饭的置办上，“食补”也成为新宠。淘宝方面表示，健康营养成为今年年夜饭的新趋势，猪肚鸡、佛跳墙等“食补”菜肴热销，花胶鸡、帝王蟹搜索量环比均翻了2倍，滋补汤包也受到热捧。
资料图：顾客正在选购“年夜饭”预制菜。 张浪 摄“吃点好的”也让预制菜迎来销售高峰。据商务大数据对重点电商平台监测，“2022全国网上年货节”启动后的10天内，半成品菜肴受追捧，预制菜销售额同比增长45.9%。
叮咚买菜也透露，今年消费者预定年夜饭相比往年大幅提前，元旦结束后的首周就迎来了年夜饭预定的首个高峰。
兔年春节就要到了，你买了哪些年货？(完)
搜索
复制
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
